I was hungry and you fed me...
This simple word of Jesus may just become the defining challenge of the next decade. Throughout the world, front page news during the past week has been addressing the growing global food shortage. It's a problem that has been created by the perfect storm of erratic climate changes and drought, rising energy prices, and the growing prosperity of the working class in both India and China. This growing middle class is aspiring, of course, to live like Americans. After all, when we harvested cheap labor overseas, we did so with the promise that their increased prosperity would result in increased purchasing power.
This has resulted in nearly two billion people seeking to eat higher up on the food chain, so that lands previously given over to grains for human consumption are now directly or indirectly being used for the raising of animal protein. Add to this a further removal of grain acres, now given over to the raising of ethanol, and you can see that there's just not as much rice as there once was. All this has let to basic agricultural commodities rising in price between 40 and 300 percent over the past year.
Even a small rise in prices has the effect of pushing countless families over the edge, into starvation. According to several sources, the roots the problem go deeper than just the issues articulated above. There are more fundamental systemic issues that need to be addressed:
1. industrial farming, for all it's promises offered at the inauguration of the Green Revolution back in 1975, has failed to deliver on it's promises to end world hunger. Though production has risen temporarily, the rise has been based on an addiction to a petroleum based agricultural economy, unsustainable over the long haul.
2. The Green Revolution consolidated land holdings in the hands of a few farmers or companies, withholding economic aid to small family farmers. This has resulted in a loss of efficiency as single crops now dominate large swaths of the landscape, depleting the soil, and demaning ever increasing chemical assistance to maintain levels of production.
3. Food now travels great distances for consumption as well. This has the effect, in poor countries, of favoring the growth of expensive export crops, creating shortages of basic nutrients in the home country. Countless examples of this are offered in Reclaiming America, by Richard Austin, out of print now I believe, but available if you try hard (and in our church library).
Austin says it well: "Our food donations may keep some starving people alive, but our policies do not help them to provide for themselves. We may show mercy at times of crisis, but we aboid the truth of why people starve."
What is needed is a deep economic policy shift, as spoken of here. Perhaps we need to be honest enough to confess that a purely unrestricted free market economy might fall short of garnering support because the policy changes that are needed will necessarily lead the wealthy of the world to embrace some measures of expense, inconvenience and sacrifice. And yet, the crossroads at which we stand is not economic only. It is moral. And if Jesus has anything to say about it, it is spiritual as well. What's needed:
1) an assessment of our lifestyles...
2) a discussion among Christians about the systemic roots of global hunger
3) commitment to concrete changes - both individual and collective
5 Comments:
I think heart change is more important than policy change because as we saw in the USSR during the last century even on the other extreme of the market (statism and socialism) lots of people starved.
We can blame market policy- and it's also easy to pretend that we have a "free market"- but we really don't. Even in this country which has that supposed "free market," our farms are massively subsidized which ends up forcing price floors that prevent developing countries to compete in a world market.
And it makes me really angry that there's people hungry in India while in Indiana there's fields of corn and wheat that are unharvested because the government pays farmers NOT to produce so that the price of grain won't bottom out...
I would like to start a nonpartisan advocacy group at Bethany to educate ourselves and our elected officials about this issue, using materials from bread.org
I would second a little bit of what natekey said...part of the problem here in the U.S. IS government regulation. Our government massively subsidizes farmers who produce a few crops (corn, wheat, soy, and I think there is one more), thus pushing the price down to artificially low levels and pushing both small farmers here in the U.S. and farmers of all sorts internationally out of business because they can't compete.
Our government also offers various subsidies related to ethanol production, despite the fact that there is not much energy gain, if any - we use about an equivalent amount of oil energy to make the same amount of ethanol - so we essentially are driving up food prices for nothing.
Oh yeah, something else I wanted to add - our government subsidies and regulations are a big reason that industrial farming has come about...
So yeah, the problem isn't really the free market right now, because the government subsidies and regulations have skewed the market. I don't think, though, that the free market would solve our problems; I just think that our government needs to redirect the focus of regulation and subsidies to encourage more sustainable agriculture...
Nate and Annonymous, all good points. Just to add, an article in the NY Times yesterday stated that the grain that goes into one tank (12 gal = mid size car) of ethanol can feed a child for a year!
If I could suggest a great read, check out:
"Scared to Death: From BSE to Global Warming: Why Scares are Costing Us the Earth "
Post a Comment
<< Home